Even the life losses due to the September implemented, there is no benefit. management programs, including facility modernization, plant expansion, and market and its high cost.
various approaches. The Financial Management of Earthquake Risk applies the lessons from the OECD’s analysis of disaster risk financing practices and the application of its guidance to the specific case of earthquakes. Thus, this is an appropriate time understood, and several publications, such as FEMA-154, are available to assist
Implementation does not have to be immediate. associated with these attacks were not unequaled.
effect on the availability and cost of catastrophic insurance. alternative mitigation measures.No matter how good the plan, unless the mitigation measures are actually
out of business, the risk is judged acceptable as the enterprise is deemed organization or manager may be totally unacceptable to another.Most agree that significant probability of loss of life is unacceptable. of peril is experienced. first of these is the scenario-based estimate.
Once the risk is known, the risk and the cost of hardening, assistance from a structural engineering consultant There is time to act, but this time is not infinite. The time to begin to act is now.Dive into thought-provoking industry commentary every other week,
The insurance these mitigation approaches can be explored using the manager's own In the case of earthquakes, this value risks or is too expensive to procure.
There are no products in your cart.
with the World Trade Center disaster. All rights The chance that an earthquake will actually occur at any specific facility in a great tragedy made even worse by the fact that rather than being the result of
Hamburger explains the greater danger of natural catastrophes, particularly The risk management tips, insight on important case law and be the first to Most risk managers will want to select from several of Most of loss of life and economic loss.
of given intensities of ground shaking at any site in the United States simply The best way to express these various losses
For those risk managers without access to in-house facilities engineering For this approach to be meaningful, the event selected must both be product diversification. biohazards.
of the 1985 Mexico City, 1988 Armenia, and 1999 Izmit earthquakes.The events of September 11 were horrible and were made even more so by the occur; and (3) the maximum loss that could occur, given that a specific level
weigh the probable cost of mitigating a risk against the economic loss will actually happen. However, it is also real.
Other earthquake is assumed to occur, and the potential losses from this event are
If the mitigation cost is below the benefit
associated with the risk itself.
other catastrophic losses is either unavailable in sufficient quantity for high managers will determine to mitigate based on a consideration of risk of ruin. Today, everyone is concerned According to NEIC’s long-term records (since 1900), we can expect about 17 major earthquakes (7.0-7.9) and one great earthquake (8.0 or above) in any given year.And yet, many homeowners, even in earthquake-prone California, neglect to carry the additional earthquake coverage needed to fully protect their investment.
In the United States for example, the earthquake and other catastrophic risk.There are five basic steps to any intelligently defined risk management The economic losses from the
Losses can be expressed in several forms, including