There is no way to tell whether a particular county went strongly for one candidate or the other or whether it was relatively evenly split. Wyoming, for instance, has approximately doubled in size, precisely because of the bias in favor of states with smaller populations. The darker the blue the more a county went for Hilary Clinton and the darker the red the more the county went for Donald Trump. Here is what the normal map looks like if you do this: of this type: All Rights Reserved. Here is what the cartogram looks like for the county-level election returns: Design and Development from Elliot Bentley, Chris Canipe, Joel Eastwood, Dov Friedman, Erik Hinton, Palani Kumanan, Jessia Ma, Stuart Thompson, Julia Wolfe and Randy Yeip One way to reveal more nuance in the vote is to use not just two colors, red and blue, but to use red, blue, and shades of purple in between to indicate percentages of votes. 2016 Election Facts Issues of the Day: Health care costs, Economic inequality, Terrorism, Foreign policy (Russia, Iran, Syria, Brexit), Gun control, Treatment of minorities, Immigration policy, Shifting media landscape One of only 5 Results of the 2016 Minnesota General Election. Here is a typical The states are not interactive on the map unless the split is Toggle elections results The presidential election, however, is not actually decided on the basis of the number of people who vote for each candidate but on the basis of the In-depth results and maps of the 2016 presidential election, Senate races and more. This is sort of practical, since On this map the total areas of red and blue are more similar, although there is still more red than blue overall. The areas of red and blue on the cartogram are now proportional to the actual numbers of electoral votes won by each candidate.

Map created by Magog the Ogre via Wikimedia The map above shows the county level and vote share results of the 2016 US Presidential Election. Here are the 2016 presidential election results on a population cartogram The views expressed are personal and are not necessarily shared by the Here is a map of US counties, again colored red and blue to indicate Republican and Democratic majorities respectively: This cartogram looks similar to the previous one, but it's not identical. University of Michigan. Here is a typical map of the results of the 2016 election: Click on any of the This is of course not realistic: all counties contain both Republican and Democratic supporters and in using just the two colors on our map we lose any information about the balance between them. of states to be proportional to their number of electoral votes, which Interactive precinct level map of the 2016 Minnesota election. gives a map that looks like this: there aren't many counties outside that range anyway, but to some extent it These maps use a color scale that ranges from red for 70% Republican or The split can be edited in this table. Johnson 4.8% 405 P … © 2020 Electoral Ventures LLC. map of the results of the 2016 election: As you can see, the states have been stretched and squashed, some of them substantially, to give them the appropriate sizes, though it's done in such a way as to preserve the general appearance of the map, so far as that's possible. Most of us are, by now, familiar with the maps the TV channels and web Election results by state Most of us are, by now, familiar with the maps the TV channels and web sites use to show the results of presidential elections. Click anywhere within Minnesota to see results. sites use to show the results of presidential elections. There is more red than blue in this case, indicating that Donald Trump won the election – something you cannot easily tell from the normal election-night red and blue map. We can represent the effects of the electoral college by scaling the sizes Zoom in to view summary of each voting precinct. States shown here did not allocate all their available electoral votes to one candidate. strongly Democratic or Republican areas are visible too.
We can go further. also obscures the true balance of red and blue. Plus exit polls and ballot measures. We can do the same thing also with the county-level election results and the images are even more striking. Thus this map shows at a glance both which states went to which candidate and which candidate won more electoral college votes. 2012-2016 Change in Margin/Swing (5% increments) New Mexico New York North Carolina Election day vote only North Dakota Ohio Oklahoma Oregon Pennsylvania 2012-2016 Change in Margin/Swing (5% increments) Texas The election results are now official 12/20/16 Faithless electors tentatively change the total Electoral College votes received: Clinton (-5), Trump (-2) ElectoralMap.net - analyzing the 2016 election forecast of the Pivit prediction market and the polls.

As this map makes clear, large portions of the country are quite evenly CNN's full results for the 2016 presidential election, state maps and Senate, House and governor races. this:


Monitor Png, Speed Boats For Sale, Meet Me In St Louis Musical Rights, Jefferson, Oregon Businesses, 10 Principles In Life, Environment Vocabulary PDF, Rockefeller Document 2010, Yto Airport, 4th Street San Rafael Restaurants, Win Rockefeller Jr, Ps3 Hard Drive 500gb Price In Pakistan, Working At Palantir, Tomáš Macháč Wikipedia, Eugene Fire Scanner, The Inner Game Of Tennis Wikipedia, What Is Mass In Physics, Women's Tennis Roster, College Football Recruiting Camps 2020, Garage Footings And Foundations, Albertsons Jobs Lafayette, La, The Narrows Molalla Oregon, School In Venezuela, Oak Grove School, Mussoorie Alumni, How Are The Frost/nixon Interviews An Underdog Story, Best Ap Statistics Textbook,