These actors comprise the audience for the series of mitigation proposals to be presented in this paper because they either build, license, distribute, or are tasked with regulating or legislating algorithmic decision-making to reduce discriminatory intent or effects.This paper draws upon the insight of 40 thought leaders from across academic disciplines, industry sectors, and civil society organizations who participated in one of two roundtables.Our goal is to juxtapose the issues that computer programmers and industry leaders face when developing algorithms with the concerns of policymakers and civil society groups who assess their implications. For example, if a job-matching algorithm’s average score for male applicants is higher than that for women, further investigation and simulations could be warranted.However, the downside of these approaches is that not all unequal outcomes are unfair. L. No. Its mission is to conduct high-quality, independent research and, based on that research, to provide innovative, practical recommendations for policymakers and the public. While the immediate consequences of biases in these areas may be small, the sheer quantity of digital interactions and inferences can amount to a new form of systemic bias. “Understanding Discrimination in the Scored Society.” SSRN Scholarly Paper. Available at https://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=2477899.Blass, Andrea, and Yuri Gurevich.
An examples of this could be college admission officers worrying about the algorithm’s exclusion of applicants from lower-income or rural areas; these are individuals who may be not federally protected but do have susceptibility to certain harms (e.g., financial hardships).In the former case, systemic bias against protected classes can lead to collective, These problematic outcomes should lead to further discussion and awareness of how algorithms work in the handling of sensitive information, and the trade-offs around fairness and accuracy in the models.While it is intuitively appealing to think that an algorithm can be blind to sensitive attributes, this is not always the case.“While it is intuitively appealing to think that an algorithm can be blind to sensitive attributes, this is not always the case.”For example, Amazon made a corporate decision to exclude certain neighborhoods from its same-day Prime delivery system. They often publish factual information that utilizes loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by using appeal to emotion or stereotypes) to favor liberal causes.
Consider the following examples, which illustrate both a range of causes and effects that either inadvertently apply different treatment to groups or deliberately generate a disparate impact on them.Online retailer Amazon, whose global workforce is 60 percent male and where men hold 74 percent of the company’s managerial positions, recently discontinued use of a recruiting algorithm after discovering gender bias.Princeton University researchers used off-the-shelf machine learning AI software to analyze and link 2.2 million words.
Save this article by becoming a member today!Join AllSides to read, share
That is why it’s important for algorithm operators and developers to always be asking themselves: We suggest that this question is one among many that the creators and operators of algorithms should consider in the design, execution, and evaluation of algorithms, which are described in the following mitigation proposals. 2 weeks 5 hours ago.
AllSides members can bookmark any article and read it later. They also illustrate how these outcomes emerge, and in some cases, without malicious intent by the creators or operators of the algorithm. If the data used to train the algorithm are more representative of some groups of people than others, the predictions from the model may also be systematically worse for unrepresented or under-representative groups. Foreign Policy. In both the public and private sector, those that stand to lose the most from biased decision-making can also play an active role in spotting it.In December 2018, President Trump signed the First Step Act, new criminal justice legislation that encourages the usage of algorithms nationwide.“When algorithms are responsibly designed, they may avoid the unfortunate consequences of amplified systemic discrimination and unethical applications.”As outlined in the paper, these types of algorithms should be concerning if there is not a process in place that incorporates technical diligence, fairness, and equity from design to execution. Brookings Institution is a 501(c)(3) non-profit organization that is funded through donations. Public agencies that regulate bias can also work to raise algorithmic literacy as part of their missions.
16 Issue 3, pp. Acknowledging the possibility and causes of bias is the first step in any mitigation approach.