Of course to get the most of it, like my teacher says, you need to be both a philosopher and a musician, but I am neither and was still able to get a good percentage of the book, at least enough to keep reading and enjoy it. In Alyssa Cole’s unnerving social thriller When No One is Watching, Sydney Green returns to Brooklyn after a traumatic breakup to find...adorno has his head up his ass a little i think but this thing still has some value to the small subsection of the world that is interested in both post-hegelian metaphysics and avant-garde western classical. Adorno. he says a dumb thing somewhere in there to the effect of "music has always been a bourgeois art form" that i think kind of epitomizes the problems with this book: it has like a really flawed sense of history in that sense and that informs where his attentions are focused. I think its only required to have a certain familiarity with the history of classical music(19th and 20th centuries).
Just a moment while we sign you in to your Goodreads account. He authored more than twenty volumes, including Negative Dialectics (1982), Philosophy of Modern Music (1980), Kierkegaard (Minnesota, 1989), Dialectic of Enlightenment (1975) with Max Horkheimer, and Aesthetic Theory (Minnesota, 1997). Consisting of two distinct essays, "Schoenberg and Progress" and "Stravinsky and Reaction," this work poses the musical extremes in which Adorno perceived the struggle for the cultural future of Europe: between human emancipation and barbarism, between the compositional techniques and achievements of Schoenberg and Stravinsky. But most of the time the prose leaves me bewildered.
Theodor W. Adorno (1903-1969) was the leading figure of the Frankfurt school of critical theory. In 1947 Theodor Adorno, one of the seminal European philosophers of the postwar years, announced his return after exile in the United States to a devastated Europe by writing Philosophy of New Music. --Cultural CritiqueTheodor W. Adorno (1903-1969) was the leading figure of the Frankfurt school of critical theory. To know stuff like what is atonal and tonal music.Ah. Even Arnold Schoenberg reviled it. He authored more than twenty volumes, including Negative Dialectics (1982), Philosophy of Modern Music (1980), Kierkegaard (Minnesota, 1989), Dialectic of Enlightenment (1975) with Max Horkheimer, and Aesthetic Theory (Minnesota, 1997).Robert Hullot-Kentor has taught at Harvard and Stanford universities and written widely on Adorno. However, Adorno does himself no favors in his rejection of popular music in favor of such exalted composers with such a dry discourse on the latter. Despite the controversy, Philosophy of New Music became highly regarded and widely read among musicians, scholars, and social philosophers. Be the first to ask a question about Philosophy of New Music This version perhaps is best English translation available.three stars to counterbalance the predominant significance of this book. This is why you remain in the best website to look the unbelievable books to have. Intensely polemical from its first publication, every aspect of this work was met with extreme reactions, from stark dismissal to outrage. ), il capitolo su Schönberg mette comunque in luce molte veritPosto che le premesse da cui parte Adorno sono ormai del tutto superate, che l'approccio hegeliano-marxista sociologico-dialettico oltre che essere nel 2020 patetico mi disgusta letteralmente, che la contrapposizione esemplare Schönberg/Stravinskij nel 1949 aveva certamente più senso che non di lì a pochi anni quando il secondo avrebbe iniziato a utilizzare, in modo peculiarissimo, le tecniche del primo (la sintesi di tesi e antitesi?
In 1947 Theodor Adorno, one of the seminal European philosophers of the postwar years, announced his return after exile in the United States to a devastated Europe by writing Philosophy of New Music. Il resto è scempiaggine. In this new translation, Philosophy of New Music emerges as an indispensable key to Adorno's illustrious and influential oeuvre.
Marking a major turning point in his musicological philosophy, Adorno located a critique of musical reproduction as internal to composition itself, rather than as a matter of the reproduction of musical performance. Poor Stravinsky.